论“同命同价”法心理之正当性及其制度观照  

The Legitimacy and System View of the Legal Psychology about " the Same Life Value "

作　　者：范雪飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,副教授法学博士重庆401120

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2012年第8期65-71,157,共7页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"死亡损害赔偿研究--‘同命同价’的价值与历史追问"(09YJA820010)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：死亡损害赔偿中民众"同命同价"的法心理,并非仅是一种朴素的良好愿望,亦非是我国社会转型时期一种不理性的社会需求,其具有价值观念的崇高性与实践理性的正当性。民众"同命同价"的法心理与学术界对之的批判,是法律专业化与制度技术化之结果与表现。我国现行死亡损害赔偿制度事实上观照了"同命同价"法心理,民众与学术界对"同命同价"之分歧得到了一定程度的化解,应建立新型的死亡损害赔偿制度以更好地观照民众"同命同价"法心理,促进法秩序的妥当形成。The legal psychology about ' the same life value ' in death compensation is lofty and practically justified rather than a simple desire or an irrational social demand in social transformation.The conflicts between the legal psychology of the public to ' the same life value ' and the critique from academic circles on it are the results as well as the manifestation of the specialization of laws and system technicalization.The present death compensation system in China views the legal psychology about ' the same life value ',the conflicts are solved to some extent.New death compensation should be set up to satisfy the legal psychology of the public to ' the same life value ' and promote the appropriate formation of legal order.

关 键 词：死亡损害赔偿 同命同价 法心理 制度观照 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]