检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈贤贵[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2012年第9期74-82,共9页Hebei Law Science
基 金:2011年度国家社会科学基金项目<台港澳民事诉讼制度改革研究>(11BFX133)
摘 要:现代型诉讼涉及各种超越个别利害关系和法定权益范畴的新型利益,具有当事人互换性缺失、系争利益呈现扩散化、争点呈现社会化、诉求內容多样性等特质,对传统的当事人适格理论产生重大的冲击。为此,除了在实体法上有所调整外,程序权保障论、诉讼政策论、纠纷管理权论、争点为限论等当事人适格理论的新发展,或可为救济被侵害的利益,保障广大受害者平等接近、使用司法的机会,也为我国相关论重构提供借镜。The modern litigation involves various new interests which beyond the individual interests and the legal rights and interests category, and has the stamp of absence of interchangeability between the party, the right in dispute take on conglomeration and diffusion, the point of dispute exhibits socialization and politicized, and the way of claim for relief has changed, which has thrown down new demand to the qualification for the proper party of traditional civil action. Therefor, in addition to the adjustment in substantive law, the new development of the theory of proper party, such as the theory of procedural right protection, litigation policy and dispute management can be for relief of the injured interests and ensure the victims use the equal opportunity to justice, also can provide reference for the related theory of our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249