抽象行政行为司法审查之实然状况与应然构造——兼论对行政规范性文件的司法监控  

Real Condition and Should Be Construction of Judicial Review of Abstract Administrative Act—— Concurrently Discussion on Judicial Supervision of Administrative Normative Document

作　　者：郭百顺 

机构地区：[1]浙江省海宁市人民法院

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2012年第3期61-68,共8页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：我国行政法学者和司法部门对抽象行政行为司法审查的关注多集中于其是否属于受案范围,一方面由于缺乏对法治国家司法审查制度的系统研究,致使对一些重要概念的认识错误在学界滋生;另一方面使得司法实践中未能切实解决涉及抽象行政行为诉讼案件的受理问题。各地法院针对涉抽象行政行为案件莫衷一是的作法,极大地破坏了法治统一,一定程度上也削弱了公民对司法的信仰。对规章以下的行政规范性文件进行司法审查有其正当性根据。The major concern by China＇s administrative law scholars and judicial departments on judicial review of the abstract administrative act concentrates upon the case accepting scope, which causes some bad phenomena, i.e. lacking systematical study of judicial review systems in countries rule of law leads to misunderstandings of importance concepts in the academic field, and the case accepting issue related to the abstract administrative act is still unsolved in practice. Meanwhile, the divergent practice of related cases by different local courts even greatly undermines the united rule of law. Therefore, it is legitimate to take judicial review on administrative normative documents below regulations.

关 键 词：受案范围 检讨 必要性 路径选择 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]