检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湛江市广东医学院附属医院肿瘤科,524001
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2000年第8期462-464,共3页Chinese Journal of Nursing
摘 要:目的 :探讨患者易于接受的廉价止呕、止恶心方法 ,使化疗过程顺利。方法 :将 480例肿瘤病人随机分为 3组。治疗组 (16 0例 ) :采用水针技术 ,所用药物与胃复安组相同 ;胃复安组 (16 0例 ) :采用胃复安 2 0mg静脉注射 ,安定 5mg肌内注射 ;枢丹组 (16 0例 ) :采用枢丹 8mg静脉注射。结果 :治疗组止吐有效率为 98.75 % ,枢丹组有效率为94.38% ,2组相比无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ;胃复安组有效率为 43.13% ,与治疗组相比有显著差异 (P <0 .0 0 1)。结论 :水针技术不仅有较好的止吐、止恶心效果 ,而且还能达到价格过高的枢丹的疗效。Objective:The aim of the study was to investigate a cheap and easy accepted method for the treatment of vomiting and nausea of the tumor patients during chemotherapy,making the course of the therapy successful.Methods:Four hundred and eighty cases of tumor patients were divided randomly into three groups:①Treatment group (160 cases):water injection treatment was used and the drugs used were as same as the Meeociopramidum group.②Meeociopramidum group (160cases):Meeociopramidum 20 mg I.V. and Valium 5 mg I.M.③MOndansetron group (160cases):Ondansetron 8mg I.V.Results:The effective rates in the treatment group were 98.75%,and 94.38% in the Ondansetron group,no significant difference between two groups ( P >0.05).The effective rate in the Meeociopramidum group was 43.13%.There was a singificantly difference when compared with the treatment group.( P <0.01).Conclusion:Water injection technique have good effects on the treatment of the vomiting and nausea and can achieve to the level in the group of expensive ondansetron. Author's address Oncology Dept of Guangdong Medical College Subsidiary Hospital,Zhanjiang,524001
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3