检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刁惠波[1] 张澄海[1] 黄河长[1] 黄伟民 刘穗芳[1]
机构地区:[1]中山医科大学附属第三医院口腔科,广东广州510630
出 处:《中山医科大学学报》2000年第4期318-319,共2页Academic Journal of Sun Yat-sen University of Medical Sciences
摘 要::【目的】探讨改良法和传统法制作桩核蜡型的优劣。【方法】随机抽取 10名口腔科非修复医师进行两种方法的实验 ,比较两种方法制作蜡型的时间、蜡型长度、完成次数、密合度、完整性。【结果】改良法制作的蜡型在制作时间、蜡型长度、完成次数、密合度、完整性方面均与传统法制作的蜡型有显著性差异。Objective To compare the traditional method and the modified method of making wax patterns of posts. Methods Each of 10 randomly chosen dentists used both 2 methods to make wax patterns of posts. Length of time and number of times of accomplishment, adaptation, integrity and length of the wax patterns made by the 2 methods were compared. Results Statically significant differences were revealed between the traditional and modified methods considering the length of time and number of times of accomplishment, adaptation, integrity and length of the wax patterns of posts. Conclusion Wax patterns made using modified method were better than those made using traditional method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229