检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学经济管理学院,成都610031 [2]川北医学院人文社科学院,南充637000
出 处:《世界科技研究与发展》2012年第4期704-707,共4页World Sci-Tech R&D
基 金:四川省教育厅人文社科研究项目(10SA083)资助
摘 要:根据现实社会经济活动中多企业多维博弈现象,首先探讨多个企业关于具有需求替代性产品产量策略的静态和动态多维博弈问题,然后求出其多维均衡结果,并通过算例对比多维博弈与单独博弈的均衡结果。分析表明:在产量策略多维动态博弈中,领头厂商将选择更高的产量策略,获得比尾随厂商更多的利润,即领头厂商具有先动优势;多维博弈下的多维Nash均衡策略优于单独博弈下的Nash均衡策略。According to the phenomena of games among multiple firms in real economic activities,production strategy of alternative products with the requirements of static and dynamic multi-dimensional game problem of a number of enterprises is explore. The multidimensional equilibrium outcome is gotten, comparing the equilibrium outcome of multi-dimensional game with a single game. Analysis shows that leading manufacturers will choose a higher production strategy to obtain more profit than the trailing manufacturers in production strategies of muhi- dimensional dynamic game, which means leading manufacturers possess first-mover advantage. Multi-dimensional game Nash equilibrium strategy is superior to the Nash equilibrium strategy under the Multi-dimensional game.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15