科学规范的理论辨析——从学院科学到后学院科学时代  

Theoretical Analysis of Scientific Norms——From Academic to Post-academic Science

作　　者：刘军仪[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学公共管理学院,北京100084

出　　处：《比较教育研究》2012年第9期5-9,共5页International and Comparative Education

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地北京师范大学比较教育研究中心重大项目<学术规范与学术道德建设的国际比较研究>(项目编号:08JJD880239);中国博士后科学基金项目(20110490394)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：从学院时代到后学院时代,知识生产模式、知识功能发生了演变和扩展,科学规范的认识论价值也发生了变化。默顿规范的普遍主义、公有主义、无私利性和有组织的怀疑态度受到了挑战。后学院科学与社会、环境的关系日益紧密和复杂,需要以自然主义的角度来审视科学规范的适用性,通过规范体系和监管机制来约束和激励研究者的行为,逐步营造和鼓励公平与公正性竞争的研究环境,确保科研诚信。From academic to post-academic science, the knowledge production model function have evolved and expanded, the epistemological value of scientific norms have also c and knowledge hanged. Merton science norms consist of universalism, Communism,disinterestedness and organized skepticism has been challenged in post-academic science. Post-academic science has close relationship with society and external environment, it needs to examine the applicability of scientific norms with naturalistic perspective, and constrain and motivate the behavior of researchers through monitoring mechanisms,and gra dually create research environment that encourage fair competition and ensure the integrity of research.

关 键 词：科学规范 学院科学 后学院科学 默顿规范 齐曼 

分 类 号：G40-01[文化科学—教育学原理]