对物诉讼制度及其对我国海事诉讼的影响探析  

An Analysis of Action in Rem System to China

作　　者：袁雪[1] 李娜[1] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工程大学,黑龙江哈尔滨150001

出　　处：《行政与法》2012年第7期82-85,共4页Administration and Law

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务经费项目"和谐理念下的社会主义市场经济法律规制研究"的阶段性成果;项目编号:HEUCF20121307;教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金"法律选择理论历史演进的法哲学研究"的阶段性成果;项目编号:160120130001;黑龙江省教育厅2010年人文社会科学研究规划项目"国际民商事争议解决中的法律冲突与法律选择研究"的阶段性成果;项目编号:11554085

摘　　要：随着国际经济一体化的发展,海事诉讼的国际趋同化趋势越来越强。在批准加入《1952年扣船公约》时,德国、法国等大陆法系国家根据公约的有关规定都部分接受了对物诉讼制度。实际上,我国的海事法律在诉讼主体、船舶扣押等方面也有着明显的对物诉讼的痕迹。因此,将这种诉讼制度运用到我国的海事诉讼中,解决目前海事对人诉讼中存在的问题具有明显的积极意义,同时有必要借鉴该制度在英美法系国家海事司法实践中适用的经验,完善我国的海事诉讼制度。Along with the development of international economic integration,the international admiralty action becomes more and more consistent.In the approval to join theInternational Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to the Arrest of seagoing ships,1952,according to the relevant provisions of the convention,Germany,France and other civil law countries had accepted part of the action in rem.Certainly,China＇s maritime law in subject of action,arrest ship etc,has the performance of the action in rem.So,it is important to use this action in China＇s admiralty action to resolve the problem which was not solved in the action in personam.It is necessary to research the history and theoretical basis of action in rem system,at the same time,reference how this system use in maritime judicial practice in common law countries and improve our admiralty action system.

关 键 词：对物诉讼 海事诉讼 扣船制度 财产保全制度 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]