检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《工业工程》2012年第4期41-46,52,共7页Industrial Engineering Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70771073)
摘 要:以基本的RS契约为基础,研究了如何实现随机需求下集中控制型VMI&TPL供应链的协调。鉴于基本的RS契约失效,设计了一种由各成员共担库存风险的风险共担型RS契约,进一步提出了基于不对称Nash协商的风险共担型RS契约。研究表明,风险共担型RS契约仅能实现供应链整体期望收益的Pareto最优,而基于不对称Nash协商的风险共担型RS契约则能同时实现供应链整体期望收益的Pareto最优和各成员期望收益的Pareto改进。The coordination problem of a supply chain under vendor managed inventory (VMI) mode with third party logistics (TPL) is studied in this paper. In the supply chain, the demands are subject to random disturbance. It is assume that the supply chain is coordinated by revenue sharing (RS) contract and it is operated under centralized control mode. Consider that the basic RS contract is no longer effective, an RS contract with the stock risk shared by retailer, supplier, and TPL is proposed to coordinate the supply chain. This contract is further extended to the RS contract combined with risk-sharing under Asymmetric Nash Negotiation. With these contracts, analysis is carried out. Results show that while the RS contract with risk-sharing can maximize the expected revenue of whole supply chain, the one with risk-sharing under Asymmetric Nash Negotiation can coordinate the supply chain well and at the same time the Pareto improvement for every member's expected revenue can be achieved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13