我国污染型环境犯罪因果关系证明方法之综合运用  

Comprehensive Use of the Proof Methods for Casual Relationship in Environmental Pollution Crime

作　　者：唐双娥[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《法学论坛》2012年第5期43-49,共7页Legal Forum

基　　金：国家社科基金"污染型环境犯罪因果关系证明研究"(10BFX044)的前期成果

摘　　要：污染型环境犯罪因果关系事实的证明较为困难,需要结合具体情况综合地运用不同的证明方法。传统的逻辑推理方法和经验法则在污染型环境犯罪因果关系基础事实的证明中是基础性的证明方法。有些污染型环境犯罪因果关系事实的证明则还需要适当运用推定方法,如疫学证明法和间接反证法。It is somewhat difficult to prove the casual relationship of the facts in environmental pollution crime cases. Therefore, different proof methods should be used comprehensively according to the case itself. Traditional logical reasoning method and ex- perience rtde are still the fundamental proof method. Causality presumption methods, such as epidemiologie proof and indirect dis- proof, should be used to prove the causation in some environmental pollution criminal cases.

关 键 词：证明方法 因果关系 污染型环境犯罪 推定 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]