2011年成都6～24月龄城乡婴幼儿辅食喂养行为综合评价  

Comprehensive evaluation of complementary feeding behavior for infants in urban and rural areas of Chengdu in 2011

作　　者：庞学红[1] 曾果[1] 李鸣[1] 冉隆蓉 陈科[3] 黄璐娇[1] 余利[1] 周岚[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学华西公共卫生学院营养与食品卫生教研室,成都610041 [2]成都市妇幼保健院儿保部 [3]成都市妇幼保健院儿保科

出　　处：《中华预防医学杂志》2012年第9期809-812,共4页Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine

基　　金：基金项目：“达能营养中心膳食营养研究与宣教基金”2010年资助项目（DIC2010-10）

摘　　要：目的调查研究2011年成都市6～24月龄婴幼儿辅食喂养行为现状及存在的问题。方法于2011年3—14月采用分层整群随机抽样方法，抽取成都市6～24月龄婴幼儿1283名作为研究对象，其中城市601名，农村682名，分为6～8、9～11和12～24月共3个月龄组。通过问卷调查收集婴幼儿辅食喂养行为相关信息，参照标准对各项辅食喂养行为进行评分和量化，建立辅食喂养行为综合评价体系，总分24分，以实际得分占满分的比率评价成都市城乡6～24月龄婴幼儿辅食喂养行为。结果成都市婴幼儿辅食喂养行为总分为（18．6±2．5）分，实际得分占满分77．6％，各部分辅食喂养行为中食物制作和选择得分最高（实际得分占满分90．7％），喂养人行为、婴幼儿行为、喂养环境及环境卫生得分均较低（实际得分占满分75．2％～76．6％）。按不同地区，城市、农村婴幼儿辅食喂养行为总分分别为（19．8±2．1）、（17．6±2．4）分，城市高于农村（P〈0．05），实际得分占满分百分比分别为82．3％、73．4％。6～8、9～11和12～24月龄组辅食喂养行为总分分别为（18．9±2．3）、（19．1±2．4）和（18．2±2．6）分，实际得分占满分百分比分别为78．9％、79．4％、75．7％。6～8月龄组与9～11月龄组得分均高于12～24月龄组（P值均〈0．01）。成都市婴幼儿辅食喂养行为合格率（得分达满分60％）为94．2％，优秀率（得分达满分80％）为44．8％，城市、农村优秀率分别为65．7％、26．4％（χ2=199．825，P〈0．01）。结论成都市婴幼儿辅食喂养行为不佳，农村辅食喂养行为水平低于城市，大月龄组辅食喂养行为水平低于小月龄组。Objective To study the status and problems of complementary feeding behavior for infants aging between 6 -24 month-old in urban and rural areas of Chengdu in 2011. Methods A total of 1283 infants aging between 6-24 month-old,including 601 from urban area and 682 from rural area, were randomly selected by stratified cluster random sampling method, and divided into three groups as 6 - 8, 9- 11 and 12 -24 month-old groups, between March and April in 2011. Information of complementary feeding behavior were collected by questionnaire, and then assessed, quantified and compared by standards. The evaluation system was established （ the total score was 24 ） , and was used to assess among children aging 6 to 24 month-old in urban and rural areas in Chengdu. Results The average score for infants in Chengdu was 18.6 ± 2.5, accounting for 77.6% of the total score. The scores of food selection and preparation were highest （90. 7% of total score） among the behavior, and the scores of caregiver＇s behavior, infants behavior, feeding environment and environmental hygiene were low （ about 75.2% - 77.6% of total score）. The average score in urban and rural groups were separately 19. 8 ±2. 1 and 17.6 ± 2. 4,the score in urban group was higher than that in rural group （ P 〈 0. 05 ） , occupying total score 82. 3% , 73.4% , respectively. The average score in 6 -8 month, 9-11 month and 12 -24 month groups were separately 18.9±2.3, 19.1 -2.4, and 18.2 ± 2.6, occupying total score 78.9%, 79.4% and 75.7%, respectively. The score in 6 -8 and 9 - 11 month groups were higher than that in 12 -24 month group （P 〈 0. 01 ）, The pass rate （above 60% of total score） was 94. 2% and excellent rate （ above 80% of total score） was 44. 8% in Chengdu. The excellent rate in urban and rural groups were separately 65.7% and 26.4% （ χ^2= 199. 825, P 〈 0. 01 ）. Conclusion The complementary feeding behavior for infants was not optimistic in Chengdu, and the behavior was even worse in rural areas and among elder in

关 键 词：婴儿 婴儿食品 摄食行为 

分 类 号：R174[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]