检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《系统管理学报》2012年第5期602-608,616,共8页Journal of Systems & Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70971123)
摘 要:以单个制造商和单个零售商组成的两阶段供应链为背景,研究了零售商建立在线渠道(简称零售商双渠道)和制造商建立在线渠道(简称制造商双渠道)两种渠道模型的区别和适用条件,以及双渠道供应链的协调机制。研究结果表明:①零售商双渠道适用于传统渠道与在线渠道的竞争力差距较小的情形,而制造商双渠道适用于传统渠道竞争力较强的情形;②数量折扣契约能够协调零售商双渠道。Consider a two-stage supply chain consisted of single manufacturer and single retailer, we study the difference between the two kinds of channel models, namely, retailer's online channel (referred as retailer's dual-channels) and manufacturer's online channel (referred as manufacturer's dual-channels), and their suitability conditions and coordination of the dual-channel supply chain. The result shows that 1) Retailer's dual-channels are suitable for the case where the competitive gap between traditional retailing channel and online channel is small, while manufacturer's dual-channels are suitable for the case where the traditional retailing channel is more competitive; 2) quantity discount contract can coordinate the retailer's dual-channels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90