检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵安成[1]
机构地区:[1]临沂市沂水中心医院检验科,山东临沂276400
出 处:《中华肿瘤防治杂志》2012年第15期1184-1186,共3页Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:目的:探讨临床上通过肿瘤5项标志进行联合检测在诊断卵巢癌中的应用价值。方法:选取我院妇科进行检查的患者1 041例,于清晨采集患者血清,并进行甲胎蛋白(AFP)、糖类抗原CA19-9、CA125、癌胚抗原(CEA)和铁蛋白(SF)5类肿瘤标志进行检测,并与各个肿瘤标志的单项检测结果进行对比分析。结果:卵巢癌组患者CA19-1平均值为58.2±17.4,其余各组平均值为7.6~18.1;卵巢癌组患者CEA平均值为35.3±7.1,其余各组平均值为1.5~7.2;卵巢癌组患者CA125平均值为618±207,其余各组平均值为12~29;卵巢癌组患者AFP平均值为79.4±38.2,其余各组平均值为2.3~2.9;卵巢癌组患者SF平均值为273±99,其余各组平均值为29~152;且5项指标检测检测阳性率均较其余各组高,P<0.05。结论:5项肿瘤标志联合检测效果显著,可以在临床卵巢癌检测中推广应用。OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical value of joint detection of the five tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. METHORDS: 1 041 patient' s serum were collected, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate anti- gen CA19 9, CA125, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), {erritin (SF) of five tumor marker were tested and comparative analysis of various tumor markers was made. RESULTS:CA19-1 in ovarian cancer patients was an average of 58.2_+ 17.4, the remaining group average's was 7.6--18.1 ; ovarian cancer group patients with CEA average of 35.3_---t-7.1 and the rest of the group average was 1.5 7.2; CA]25 in ovarian cancer group was 618±207 in average and the other groups average was between 12--29; AFP in ovarian cancer group was 79.4±38.2, the rest group average of 2.3--2.9; SF average in ovarian cancer patients was 273 ±99, other group average 29--152; five indexes in positive rate was higher in ovarian cancer group compared to other groups (P〈0.05). CONCLUSION: The tumor markers combined detection significantly promote the application in the clinical detection of ovarian cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.59