检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周标龙[1]
机构地区:[1]衡阳师范学院经济与法律系,湖南衡阳421002
出 处:《衡阳师范学院学报》2012年第4期44-48,共5页Journal of Hengyang Normal University
基 金:湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目"刑事诉讼权力制约机制研究"(11YBA036)阶段性成果
摘 要:我国刑事诉讼法规定公安机关与检察机关应当互相配合,同时规定检察机关对公安机关侦查活动进行监督。然而,警检配合与侦查监督具有矛盾性:加强警检配合会削弱侦查监督;加强侦查监督则会使警检难以相互配合。我国应以提高对犯罪的有效追诉为目标构建相互配合与协作的警检关系。同时,应当完善侦查权制约机制以防止侦查权的滥用。The Criminal Procedure Law of China stipulates that the police and the procurator should co-operate with each other and that the procurator supervises the investigating activities by the police. However there exists contradiction between the "co- operation" and the "supervision".. if the co-operation between the police and the procurator is strengthened, the function of su- pervision to the investigative power will be weakened; if the supervision to the investigative power is strengthened, the co-oper- ation between the police and the procurator will not work well. We ought to design a mode of relationship between the police and the procurator that the police and the procurator co-operate with each other intensely in order to complete the mission of crime control. At the same , it's necessary to strengthen the checking mechanism to the investigation power of the police.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56