检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学心理系暨心理应用研究中心,广州510631
出 处:《中国性科学》2012年第9期79-82,共4页Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
摘 要:目的:了解中国大学生对待同性恋者的偏见程度,以及大学生社会支配倾向与同性恋偏见之间的关系。方法:以295名大学生为研究对象,采用社会支配倾向中文版量表以及同性恋态度量表进行调查。结果:(1)大学生对同性恋偏见处于中等偏低水平,且男生对同性恋的偏见程度显著高于女生。(2)社会支配倾向与同性恋偏见呈显著正相关,且支持群体基础的支配、反对平等、排外主义三个成分均与同性恋偏见呈显著正相关。(3)回归分析结果显示,社会支配倾向中的排外主义维度能显著预测同性恋偏见。结论:大学生对同性恋者态度较为宽容;大学生对同性恋者偏见存在显著性别差异;社会支配倾向与同性恋偏见关系密切;减少同性恋偏见可从降低社会支配倾向入手。Objectives: To investigate the degree of prejudice against homosexuality among Chinese college students, and examine the correlations between social dominance orientation and prejudice aganist homosexuality among college students. Method: A total of 295 college students were examined using the scale of Social Dominance Orientation (Chinese version) and the scale of homosexuality attitude. Results:①the degree of prejudice against homosexuality among college students was below average. Male students hold more prejudice against homosexuality than female students. ②Social dominance orientation was positively correlated with prejudice against homosexuality. Support for group - based dominance, equality opposition, exclusionism were all positively correlated with homosexuality prejudice. ③Regression analysis revealed that exclusionism in social dominance orientation was the significant predictor of prejudice aganist homosexuality. Conclusion: College students hold tolerant attitude to homosexuality; There exists differences in homoseuxality prejudice between male and female students; Social dominance orientation and prejudice against homosexuality were closed related. Prejudice toward homosexuality can be reduced by lowering social dominance orientation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7