检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晶[1,2] 王亚平[1] 杨斌[1] 冯雁玲[1] 王志忠[1] 李国强[1] 李艳芬[1]
机构地区:[1]北京军区总医院第三门诊部,100012 [2]河南省信阳市第一人民医院神经内科
出 处:《中华保健医学杂志》2012年第4期296-298,共3页Chinese Journal of Health Care and Medicine
摘 要:目的观察社区路径干预对脑血管病预后的影响。方法将社区脑血管病患者168例随机分为路径干预组85例和普通干预组83例,进行动态观察,比较两组血脂、血压、血小板聚集率、纤维蛋白原水平的变化及脑卒中的发病率、健康知晓率、危险因素控制率及依从性等。结果干预后,路径干预组较普通干预组血脂、血压、血小板聚集率、纤维蛋白原水平及脑卒中的发病率均有明显的下降,健康知晓率、危险因素控制率及依从性显著提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对社区脑血管病患者进行路径干预,使社区干预更加规范化、系统化、流程化,是脑血管病社区干预质量和效果的基础保证。Objective To observe influence of community intervention on cerebrovaseular disease prognosis. Methods One hundred and sixty-eight cases of eerebrovascular disease patients community-dwelling were randomly divided into path intervention group (85 cases)and common control intervention group (83 cases). Parameters of lipids,blood pressure,platelet aggregation rate, fibrinogen levels as well as incidence of stroke,health awareness,risk factors,control rates amt compliance were observed. Results Parameters of lipids,blood pressure,platelet aggregation rate,fibrinogen levels in the intervention group were significantly reduced (P〈0.05),also the health awareness,risk factors control rates and compliance increased significantly (P〈0.05)compared with conlrol group respectively. Conclusions For the community-dwelling cerebmvascular disease intervention,the community paths help intervention more standardized, systematic,processing and is the basis of" quality and effect guarantee.
分 类 号:R743[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28