借贷合同案件的证明责任分配  

Burden distribution of the proof in the case of loan contract

作　　者：白迎春[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古民族大学政法与历史学院

出　　处：《经济研究导刊》2012年第23期164-168,共5页Economic Research Guide

基　　金：内蒙古民族大学博士科研启动基金项目哲学社会科学"民事诉讼中的证明责任分配"(Bs270)阶段性成果

摘　　要：民事案件证明责任分配不统一的问题引起学术界与司法实务界的关注。与侵权诉讼中的证明责任分配相比,合同纠纷案件的证明责任分配的争议不大。但是对同一案件或同一类案件的证明责任分配,合议庭每个成员或一审和二审或各个法院的判决持己见已经屡见不鲜。尤其是看似简单的借贷合同等案件的证明责任分配意见很难统一。运用具体诉讼具体分析、参考国外先进诉讼制度的方法探究与论证:合同案件中,客观证明责任分配不是考虑分配给原告还是被告,而是以诉讼请求为单位,在债权人和债务人之间分配的。通过验证:以上证明责任分配基准通用于各类合同案件。Distribution of burden of proof in civil cases is not the question of unification of attracted the attention of academic and judicial practice communities. Compared with the distribution of burden of proof in infringement litigation, allocation of burden of proof in the case on dispute over contract dispute is unlikely. But on the same case or the same allocation of burden of proof in such cases, members of the collegial panel each or judgment of the Court of first instance and second instance or individual opinions had been not uncommon. Espe- cially the seemingly simple loan contract allocation of the burden of proof in such cases it is difficult to generalize. Using concrete analysis of concrete actions, reference methods and demonstration of advanced foreign litigation system： in the case of contracts, objective allocation is not a consideration for the allocation of the burden of proof to the plaintiff is accused, but units of claim, distributed among the creditors and debtors. Validation： assign a base are used above the burden of proof in cases of various types of contracts.

关 键 词：证明责任 提供证据的责任 证明责任的分配 反驳 抗辩 否认 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]