检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张国清[1]
出 处:《徐州工程学院学报(社会科学版)》2012年第5期15-21,共7页Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目"社区治理研究"(09JDDF003YB);2008年浙江省"钱江人才"计划项目"集体意向性和群际冲突"(205000-F40801)
摘 要:面对价值多元和利益分化的现实,如何维持社会诚信是人们面临的紧迫问题,也是亟待作哲学检讨的学理问题。作为社会诚信的对立面,社会失信格格不入于中国特色社会主义事业。文章检讨了社会失信的主要表现及其后果,揭示了社会失信的哲学根源,探讨了以爱为基础,以契约为保障,透过真诚行动,倡导社会诚信进而建设诚信社会,并且主张与西方哲学相比较。中国哲学在诚信问题上的探讨,更值得今天的社会诚信倡导者认真对待和积极借鉴。In the face of the reality of value pluralism and interest differentiation, it becomes an urgent problem and an academic problem worthy of philosophical review how to maintain the social integrity. As the antithesis of social integrity, the lack of social integrity is incompatible with the cause of socialism with Chinese characteristics. This paper reviews the main manifestations and consequences of the lack of social integrity. It reveals its philosophical root and discusses the possibility of advocating social integrity and then building an integrity society, which should be founded on love, guaranteed through contracts, and pushed by sincere action. The paper points out that compared with western philosophy, the Chinese phi- losophy contributes more to the discussion of integrity, which deserves the serious attention and active ref- erence of today's advocators of social integrity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.115.82