头位照相法与量角器法测量代偿头位的比较研究  

Comparison between photographic analysis and orthopedic goniometer of measurement of compensatory head posture

作　　者：杨士强[1] 赵堪兴[1] 郭新[1] 马惠芝[1] 岳以英[1] 陈霞[1] 朱丽娜[1] 张伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津医科大学眼科临床学院天津市眼科医院天津市眼科研究所天津市眼科学与视觉发育重点实验室,300020

出　　处：《中华眼科杂志》2012年第9期789-793,共5页Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology

基　　金：天津市卫生局科技基金项目（2011ky33）

摘　　要：目的探讨相对参照点头位照相法和骨科量角器法在临床测量代偿头位角度的应用，并比较两种方法的特点。方法随机数字表法选择2011年3至4月及8至9月于天津市眼科医院住院治疗的有代偿头位患者30例，分别采用头位照相法和骨科量角器法先后测量患者头位在3个轴向（矢状轴、垂直轴、水平轴）扭转的角度。采用配对t检验统计方法比较两种方法测量的结果。结果头位照相法测量代偿头位扭转角为15．62°±7．48°；骨科量角器法测量代偿头位扭转角为15．50°±6．99°，两种方法测量结果之间积矩相关系数r=0．955（P〈0．01），差异无统计学意义（t=0．286，P=0．777）。结论相对参照点头位照相法和骨科量角器法操作简便，是适合临床应用的测量代偿头位的方法。两种方法测量代偿头位扭转角度结果一致性好。Objective To evaluate the application of relative reference point photographic analysis method and goniometer method for head posture measurement, and compare the characteristics of the two methods. Methods Thirty patients from March 2011 to April 2011 and August to September with AHP in our hospital were recruited. The AHP were measured by photographic analysis and goniometer method respectively. The data were analyzed by SPSS software. Results The mean AHP was 15.62°± 7.48° by photographic analysis measurement, 15.50°± 6. 99° by goniometer measurement. The Pearson＇s correlation coefficient（ r = 0. 955, P 〈 0. 001, t = 0. 286, P = 0. 777 ） . Conclusions Relative reference point photographic analysis is a simple and effective way to measure AHP. The results measured by the two methods are highly consistent.

关 键 词：体位 摄影术 斜视 诊断技术 眼科 

分 类 号：R777.41[医药卫生—眼科]