ProTaper机用镍钛锉根管预备的临床效果分析  

Clinical evaluation of ProTaper NiTi instruments in root canal preparation

作　　者：邹芳[1] 徐天舒[1] 路和平[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省常州市第一人民医院口腔科,常州213003

出　　处：《口腔医学》2012年第9期546-547,557,共3页Stomatology

摘　　要：目的评价ProTaper机用镍钛锉根管预备的临床效果。方法选择300颗患牙(638个根管)随机分为ProTaper组和K锉组,分别用ProTaper机用镍钛锉和K锉进行根管预备,采用χ2检验比较根管预备后的疼痛反应、根管充填效果及器械分离情况。结果 ProTaper组根管预备后疼痛发生率为6.00%,较K锉组的根管预备后疼痛发生率(26.67%)少(P<0.01),ProTaper组根管恰填率为93.77%,较K锉组(88.64%)高(P<0.05),两组间的器械分离则无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论ProTaper机用镍钛锉能有效降低根管预备后疼痛的发生和提高根管充填质量,而且较为安全。Objective To assess the clinical effects of ProTaper NiTi instruments in root canal preparation. Methods A total of 300 teeth which needed endodontic treatment were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups. The root canals were prepared with Pro- Taper NiTi instruments in ProTaper group and with K-files in K-files group respectively. The incidence of endodontic interappointment emergences （ EIAE）, the effects of canal obturation and incidence of the instrument fracture were compared by x2 test. Results The incidence of EIAE （6.00%） in ProTaper group were significantly lower than that in the K-files group （26.67%） （ P 〈 0.01 ）. The rate of adequate root canal filling （93.77%） in ProTaper group were significantly higher than that in K-files group （88.64%） （P 〈 0.05）. There was no significant difference in the incidence of instrument fracture between ProTaper group and K-files group （P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusions Using ProTaper NiTi instruments can reduce the incidence of EIAE and improve the effects of canal obturation. It is safe to use ProTaper NiTi instruments in root canal therapy.

关 键 词：PROTAPER机用镍钛锉 根管预备 根管治疗 

分 类 号：R781.05[医药卫生—口腔医学]