检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海大学ADR与仲裁研究院 [2]上海大学法学院
出 处:《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第5期50-56,共7页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:2011年上海市教委科研创新重点项目"中国特色社区调解制度若干问题研究"(项目批准号11ZS97)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:当下我国的司法审判中经常出现这样的问题:法官在审理复杂疑难的案件时,面对国家法的空白、漏洞、不足时,如何对民间规则进行司法识别与适用,并作出适当的审判。一起婚姻家庭案件的司法审判过程表明,我国司法审判的法源是国家法,民间规则的司法适用只是为了填补国家法的漏洞,应当严格适用条件,防止滥用,因此,民间规则的司法适用必须进行识别程序,这个识别程序包括民间规则的主张、举证以及查明三个环节,其中当事人与法官承担着不同的责任:当事人主张存在某项民间规则并予以举证;法官识别与适用该项民间规则。法官对民间规则的识别内容包括规范识别与效力识别两个方面。在相关的制度设计上,我国应当建立民间规则的司法识别机制,主要包括设立法官识别民间规则的标准、以民间规则的汇编建立案例指导制度等。Nowadays judicial trials are often confronted with the question of how to identity and apply civil norms to facilitate appropriate judgment making when hearing difficult cases in the presence of missing, vulnerable, or insufficient state law. A judicial trial process of a marital family case showed that source of law in China is state law and judicial application of folk law is to fill legal loopholes. Therefore, strict conditions should apply to prevent the abuse of civil norms. Accordingly, identification procedures must be undertaken when applying civil norms to judicial practices. The identification process involves three steps: claim, proof and verification, where the parties and judges assume different responsibilities. The privy who claims the civil norms bears the burden of proof. It' s the judge' s duty to ascertain and apply the appropriate civil norms. Identification of civil norms involves recognition of the norm and its legality. In terms of institutional design, China should establish the mechanism of judicial recognition of the civil norms, including introducing the standards of the identification and compiling civil norms to guide their application with case studies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7