《洪兴祖〈论语说〉辑佚》补正  

The Correction of the "Hong Xing-zu's The Analects of Confucius Collection"

作　　者：许家星[1] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学人文学院,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《江南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2012年第5期80-86,共7页Journal of Jiangnan University：Humanities & Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<江右四书学研究>(10YJC720053);江西省高校人文社科重点研究基地招标项目<元代江右四书学研究>(JD1006);国家社科基金项目<道学经典诠释>(11BZX040);江西省社科规划项目<朱子四书学系列比较研究>(11ZX05)

摘　　要：洪兴祖《论语说》是宋代重要的经学著作,惜乎不传。《洪兴祖〈论语说〉辑佚》一文据《论语集注》、《论语大全》辑佚二十五条,亦间有疏误。今补充《辑佚》漏引二书之2条,并据《论语或问》补17条、据《四书通》补13条、据《论语集说》及《经典稽疑》补4条,共增补36条。另将《或问》、《四书通》所同于《大全》者进行比较,纠讹正误,以显《论语说》之原貌。据此可窥洪氏论语学考证精详、说理透彻之特点。Hong Xing-zu＇s ＂The Analects of Confucius＂ was an important Confucian writing of Song Dynasty. The scattered Analects of Confucius of Hong Xing-zu were complied by ＂The Analects of Confucius Variorum＂ and ＂the Analects of Confucius. ＂ This collection mistakenly left out 2 sentences, according to ＂The Analects of Confucius or Suggestion＂ was 17, ＂The Four Books＂ was 13, and ＂The Analects Set＂ and ＂Classic Protracted Suspect＂ were 4, a total of 36 were added. Compared The Suggestion and The Four Books with The Collection, we can correct the wrong, and to learn the original appearance of The Analects of Confucius. Accordingly we can learn the Hong Analects research fine details and the incisive analysis.

关 键 词：洪兴祖 《论语说》 辑佚 补正 

分 类 号：K244[历史地理—历史学]