检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高莹[1] 杨晓松[1] 鲁晶[1] 赵晶[1] 刘晓雯[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军第210医院药剂科,辽宁大连116021
出 处:《成都医学院学报》2012年第02Z期78-78,共1页Journal of Chengdu Medical College
摘 要:目的:探讨羚羊角口服液对急性白血病发热患者的治疗作用。方法:选择急性白血病发热患者60例,接入院顺序分为治疗组和对照组各30例,治疗组在原发病化疗基础上给予羚羊角口服液,同时给予常规抗生素治疗。对照组在原发病化疗基础上,仅给予常规抗生素治疗。结果:在急性白血病发热患者发热控制治疗组总有效率86.7%,对照组总有效率60.0%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(p〈0.05)。治疗组体温下降时间为4—6h。平均(5.12±0.78)h,对照组体温开始下降时间为24±48h,平均(35.28±11.64)h;治疗组体温恢复正常时问为48~96h,平均(71.08±18.36)h,对照组体温恢复正常时闻为96—216h,平均(154.08±38.56)h,两组比较差异有统计学意义(p〈0.05)。结论:羚羊角口服液治疗白血病发热患者有较好疗效。Objective To discuss the curative effect of corun antelopis oral liquid on cute leukemia febrile patients. Methods: Select 60 cases of cute leukemia febrile patients who were divided into treatment SToup (30 cases) and control group (30 cases) according to the admission order. Treatment group was given cornu antelopis oral liquid based on the chemotherapy, at the same time was treated with antibiotic treatment. Central group was treated with antibiotic treatment based on the chemotherapy. Results The toUd effective rate in treatment group was 86.7%, in control group was 60.0%, the difference between two groups showed statistical significance ( P 〈 0.05 ). The body temperature drops time in treatment group was 4 - 6h, average (5.12 ± 0.78) h, in control group was 24 - 48h, average ( 35.28 + 11.64 ) h, the time of body temperature returns to normal was 48± 96 h in treatment group, average ( 71.08± 18.36 ) h, in control group was 96 - 216h, average ( 154.08 ± 38.56) h, the difference between two groups showed statistical significance ( P 〈0.05 ). Conclusion Comu antelopis oral liquid had the better effect in treating acute leukemia febrile patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.83.171