检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省佛山市第二人民医院儿科,广东佛山528000 [2]广东省佛山市第二人民医院质控科,广东佛山528000
出 处:《中国医药导报》2012年第28期125-126,129,共3页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的探讨社区综合干预措施对青少年心理行为问题的影响。方法采用GHQ、SAS、SDS量表对青少年心理和行为问题进行评定,比较采取社区综合性干预措施前后青少年心理行为问题差异,用χ2和t检验进行统计学分析。结果干预后青少年心理健康知识掌握率高于干预前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后GHQ各方面分数和总分较干预前明显变化,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后SAS、SDS得分较干预前明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后学生的学习成绩和行为表现进步明显。结论社区综合干预措施可减少青少年心理行为问题的发生,并且可以有效地提高青少年的社会生活能力水平。Objective To discuss the influence of comprehensive community intervention measures on adolescent psycho- logical behavior problems. Methods General health questionnaire (GHQ), self rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to evaluate adolescent psychological and behavioral problems, which were compared be- tween before and after comprehensive community intervention. χ2 and t test were used to carry out statistical analysis. Re- sults Awareness rate of mental health knowledge in adolescent after comprehensive community intervention was higher than that of before intervention, the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Compared with before comprehensive com- munity intervention, changes of each question and total scores of GHQ after intervention showed statistically significance (P 〈 0.05). Scores of SAS and SDS after comprehensive community intervention were statistically lower than those of be- fore intervention (P 〈 0.05). After comprehensive community intervention, students' school records and behavioral expres- sions progressed obviously. Conclusion Comprehensive community intervention not only can decrease occurrence of ado- lescent psychological health problems, but also effectively improve their social life ability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28