检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院,江苏南京210037
出 处:《西南林业大学学报(自然科学)》2012年第5期71-76,111,共6页Journal of Southwest Forestry University:Natural Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(30571491)资助;国家林业局公益性行业科研专项(200804006/rhh-11)资助;南京林业大学科技创新基金项目(CX2011-24)资助;江苏省林业三项工程项目(lysx(2009)46)资助;江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目(PAPD)资助
摘 要:基于RS与GIS,结合遥感航片影像对徐州市绿地景观格局进行分析,用梯度分析法研究其城市中心与城市边缘的景观格局梯度差异。结果表明:徐州市区以公园绿地和其他绿地类型为主,由于受城市化进程以及人为规划的影响,城市绿地破碎化程度严重,绿地斑块类型的形状总体比较简单,不利于城市生物多样性的维护和建立;不同景观指数沿样带梯度表现出差异性,城市边缘区的景观多样性和破碎度总体低于城市中心,对城市边缘区与城市中心区的斑块形状研究说明,在一定范围内城市中心区斑块形状更趋于规则。The green space landscape pattern in the urban area of Xuzhou City was studied based on remote sensing image and supported by RS and GIS technology, and the gradient differences in the landscape pattern between the urban and suburban areas were analyzed by Gradient Analysis Method. The results showed that public greenspaces and other greenspaces were the main types of greenspaces in the urban area of Xuzhou City. The urban greenspaces were severely fragmented because of the impact of urbanization and human planning. The patch types of greenspace were usually simple in the shape, which was not beneficial to establishing and maintaining the biodiversity in the urban area. There were differences in the landscape indexes along the plot gradient, the landscape diversity and landscape fragmentation level in the suburban area were generally lower than those of in the urban area. The study on patch shape of the greenspaces showed that the patch shape in the urban center tended to be more reg- ular than that of in the suburban fringe.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249