Orbscan眼前节分析系统与超声对近视患者角膜中央厚度测量值的比较  

Comparison for orbscan anterior segment analysis system and ultrasound in the measurement values of central corneal thickness for patients with myopia

作　　者：史强[1] 王青[1] 罗一青[1] 张宇宏[1] 

机构地区：[1]青海大学附属医院眼科,青海西宁810001

出　　处：《现代预防医学》2012年第19期5081-5082,5085,共3页Modern Preventive Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较Orbscan眼前节分析系统与超声对近视患者角膜中央厚度测量值。方法选取某院2008年1月～2012年1月间入院治疗的110例患者为研究对象,针对相关测量结果进行了比较分析。结果 Orbscan方法结果介于451～603μm之间,平均值为(518.36±31.54)μm;超生侧厚方法结果介于478～614μm之间,平均值为(538.12±23.11)μm。两组方法之间比较,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);检测结果按照中央厚度区间分组比较,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);检测结果按照屈光度分组比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。结论在对近视患者角膜中央厚度进行测量的过程中,要注意区别不同的检测方法之间的差异。OBJECTIVE To compare the measurement values for orbscan anterior segment analysis system and ultrasound in the measurement values of central corneal thickness for patients with myopia.METHODS 110 patients hospitalized in our hospital from January 2008 to January 2012 were chosen as the research objects.Took a comparative analysis of related measurements.RESULTS The method results of orbscan topography was at the range of 451-603μm with a mean of（518.36 ± 31.54） μm.The bounce back side of the thick method results was at the range of 478-614μm between an average of（538.12 ± 23.11） μm.Compared between the two methods,P﹤0.05,the differences were statistically significant.The test results were compared according to the central thickness interval grouping,P﹤0.05,the difference was statistically significant.The test results were compared in accordance with diopter grouping,P﹥0.05,the differences were not statistically significant.CONCLUSION In the process of measurement of central corneal thickness in patients with myopia,we should notice the difference between the different detection methods.

关 键 词：Orbscan眼前节分析系统 超声角膜测厚 视患 角膜 

分 类 号：R770.41[医药卫生—眼科]