检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:麦燕[1] 麦燕婷[2] 麦丁尹[3] 安克[1] 钱沁佳[1]
机构地区:[1]海南省农垦三亚医院妇产科,海南三亚572000 [2]海南省农垦三亚医院ICU科,海南三亚572000 [3]海南省农垦三亚医院呼吸科,海南三亚572000
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2012年第27期5322-5323,5237,共3页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
摘 要:目的:对比和探讨双极电凝和缝合止血法对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者卵巢功能的影响。方法:所有患者均于全麻后常规行腹腔镜下子宫切除手术,并进行止血处理。研究组患者均采用双极电凝止血法,对照组患者均行缝合止血法。结果:两组患者术前激素水平各指标无显著差异(P>0.05),术后1个月和3个月FSH、LH、INHB、E2研究组与对照组比较具有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:双极电凝法和缝合止血法对患者的卵巢功能均有影响,但双极电凝法的损伤程度更大。Objective: To compare and discuss the affect of ovarian function in patients with laparoscopic hysterectomy treated by bipolar coagulation stop-bleeding-method and suture hemostasis. Methods: All patients had surgery with traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy after anesthesia. Study Group was bleeding stop with bipolar coagulation stop-bleeding-method and Control Group was with suture hemostasis. Results: The hormone targets of two groups had no significant difference before surgery (P〉0.05), and FSH, LH, 1NHB, E2 had significant difference between Study Group and Control Group (P〈0.05). 3 cases had menstrual abnormalities in Study Group and none in Control Group, the data had significantly different (P〈0.05). Conclusion: There are both affection to ovarian function of bipolar coagulation stop-bleeding-method and suture hemostasis, and bipolar coagulation has more damages for patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145