民事证据客观全面收集原则质疑  

On the Principle of Collectting Necessary Evidence in Civil Proceedings

作　　者：肖晗[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《河北法学》2012年第10期86-90,共5页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<民事诉讼证明权及其保障研究>(09YJA820019);湖南省教育厅人文社科课题<民事诉讼证明权研究>(09A064)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：一些法学著述把客观全面收集作为民事诉讼证据收集的原则或要求之一,这在人民法院主导证据收集的职权主义时期是不容置疑的。但是随着民事诉讼体制和模式的转型,在当今的我国司法实践中,证据收集已转变成当事人主导型。与此相适应,证据收集的原则也应有所调整,即从客观全面收集转换成收集必要证据的原则。否则,将因与时不合而令人生疑。What evidences are wholly collected in civil proceedings is thought as a principle by some textbooks.But the author thinks that the thought dose not adapt to the actual complexion today,because the mode of civil proceedings has changed from authoritative system to adversary system.Today,evidences are dominantly collected by parties that have themselves interests,so,each party only collects the favorable evidences for himself.Base on this,what the evidences are wholly collceted in civil proceedings is impossible,but is necessary.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 证据收集 全面收集 必要证据 

分 类 号：DF713[政治法律—诉讼法学]