检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁省肿瘤医院药剂科,辽宁沈阳110042 [2]辽宁省肿瘤医院胸外科,辽宁沈阳110042
出 处:《临床肺科杂志》2012年第11期2046-2047,共2页Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨重组人血管内皮抑制素(恩度)联合化疗方案治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效与毒副反应。方法选择NSCLC患者58例,随机分为观察组与对照组各29例,观察组给予恩度联合常规化疗,对照组给予单纯常规化疗,比较两组患者治疗效果与毒副反应。结果所有患者均完成2个周期以上,两组患者近期疗效比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);观察组1年总生存率(58.6%)与1年内肿瘤无进展生存率(20.7%)均显著高于对照组(27.6%,3.4%)(P<0.05),随访至今,观察组肿瘤无进展生存期(PFS)显著高于对照组(P<0.01);两组毒副反应比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论恩度联合化疗方案治疗NSCLC疗效显著且安全性高,且不增加毒副反应发生率。Objective To discuss the efficacy and safety of rh-endostatin injection (endostar) combined with TP, GP or NP regi- men in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods 58 patients with NSCLC were randomly divided into the endostar combined with routine chemotherapy group ( observation group, n = 29 ) and the routine chemotherapy group ( control group, n = 29 ). Re- suits There was no significant differences in the efficacies and the disease control rate between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). The one-year overall survival time of observation group and control group were 7.2 months and 5.2months, with significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The one-year survival rate (58.6%) and tumor progression-free survival rate within one-year (20.7%) in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group (27.6% , 3.4% ) ( P 〈 0. 05 ). So far, the PFS of observation group was significantly longer than con- trol group(P 〈 0.01 ). There was no significant difference in the toxicity between the two groups (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Endostar combined chemotherapy is effective and safe in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, without increasing the toxicities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28