检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第三医院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040 [2]哈尔滨市第一医院超声科
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2000年第6期479-480,共2页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
摘 要:目的 探讨能量多普勒显像 (PDI)对软组织实性肿块的诊断价值。方法 应用CDFI、PDI技术检查 45例软组织实性肿块病人 ,分析CDFI、PDI血流检出率及血流信号分级。结果 45例软组织实性肿块中良性肿块 2 4例 ,恶性肿瘤为 2 1例 ,PDI血流检出率高于CDFI ,P <0 0 1 ;以血流信号Ⅱ~Ⅲ级判断为恶性肿瘤 ,0~Ⅰ级判断为良性肿块 ,PDI、CDFI对良恶性肿瘤鉴别均有统计学意义。且PDI假阴性为 0 ,CDFI假阴性为 1 9 0 %。结论 PDI血流敏感性高于CDFI。Objective To discuss the value of diagnosing the soft tissue masses by Doppler Power Imaging. Methods CDFI and DPI were performed in 45 cases of tissue masses in order to analize the blood flow detection rates of CDFI and PDI and the degree of blood flow signals. Results Of these 45 cases,24 cases are benign masses,and 21 cases are malignant.The blood flow detection rate of PDI is higher than that of CDFI( P< 0 01).Malignant tumor is decided by the blood flow signal degree Ⅱ to Ⅲ and the benign is degree 0 to Ⅰ.PDI and CDFI are significant in statistic in deferentiating both the benign and the malignant tumors.The false negative rate of PDI is 0,and that of CDFI is 19 0%. Conclusion PDI is more detective than CDFI.It is more benefit to distinguish the benign and malignant tumors in soft tissue. [
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175