检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马新福[1] 张成武[1] 文英[1] 周伟[1] 才保加[1] 缪魏[1] 刘宁[1] 王晓龙[1] 王成[1]
机构地区:[1]青海大学附属医院胃肠肿瘤外科,青海省西宁810001
出 处:《中国基层医药》2012年第20期3048-3049,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
摘 要:目的比较胃癌根治术中应用无结扎线技术(Ligasure血管闭合系统)与传统手术的安全性与有效性。方法60例胃癌患者分两组,30例采用无结扎线技术(治疗组),30例按传统方法行胃癌根治作对照(对照组),比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、并发症及治疗费用。结果与对照组相比,治疗组治疗时间缩短,出血量减少,住院时间短,并发症少,治疗费用减少。结论无结扎线技术应用于胃癌切除术是安全有效的。Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of ligature between traditional ligation way in gas- trectomy. Methods 60 patients with gastrointestinal cancioma were selected and randomly divided into two groups,30 cases of ligature( treatment group) ,30 cases of ligation (traditional group). Results The operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, complications and treatment costs was compared between the two groups. Compared with the traditional group, there were shorter treatment time, reduced bleeding, shorter hospital stay, fewer complications, re- duced treatment costs in treatment group. Conclusion Ligature gastrectomy is safe and effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56