检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]海军工程大学理学院外国语言文学系 [2]军事科学院<战略研究>杂志
出 处:《和平与发展》2012年第5期26-32,67-68,共7页Peace and Development
摘 要:自2012年1月份美国释出战略转向新文件以来,在中国战略环境发生何种性质、何种程度变化的问题上,悲观的论调一时盛行。但我们应该看到,美国虽在政治意志上咄咄逼人,但在军事行动上却难掩后退之意,其战略新转向在意志和行动之间存在一定的落差,这一点可从美国亚太前沿存在的新形式上窥见一斑。不过,鉴于美国前沿存在形式的调整,中国也需要在策略上做出新的因应,方能争取主动,防患于未然。Following the disclosure of the U.S. strategic shift by the newly-published documents in the first month of 2012, pessimistic views and arguments have been in the vogue for a time in China, as regards to the questions of whether China's strategic environments have changed or not, and to what extent and how? It is, nevertheless, suitable for us to have a clear view that although the U.S. acts with a strong-willed and overbearing air, it can hardly hide its intention of retreat in its military actions. In fact, there still exists a certain degree of disparity between its will and its deeds in its new strategic shift, which can be easily seen from the new form of the U.S. forward presence in the Asia Pacific. However, in view of the changes to the new form, China must also have to accommodate the changing environment in its tactics, so as to gain initiative and prepare for every eventuality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.83.240