检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金星[1] 万萍[1] 吴绪波[1] 孙克兴[1] 张海蒙[1] 黄昭鸣[2]
机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学,上海市201203 [2]华东师范大学言语听觉科学重点实验室,上海市200062
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2012年第10期913-915,共3页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
基 金:上海市教委预算内课题(2010JW18)
摘 要:目的探讨痉挛型和手足徐动型脑瘫患儿的口咽腔共鸣功能是否存在显著的类型特征。方法采用声学测量,对这两类患儿核心韵母/ɑ/、/i/、/u/的第一、第二共振峰值(F1、F2)进行对比分析。结果痉挛型和手足徐动型患儿中口咽腔共鸣障碍发生率分别为71%和95%;两类患儿的/ɑ/、/i/、/u/的F1、F2值均不存在显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论两类脑瘫患儿口咽腔共鸣障碍的发病率较高,且其口咽腔共鸣功能不存在显著的类型特征。Objective To explore whether there is significant difference in the oral-pharyngeal resonance function between children with spastic and athetoid cerebral palsy.Methods The acoustic parameters(F1、F2) of /ɑ/、/i/、/u/ were compared between these two kinds of children.Results The incidence of oral-pharyngeal resonance disorder were 71% and 95% in the children with spastic cerebral palsy and athetoid cerebral palsy respectively.There was no significant difference in F1 and F2 of /ɑ/、/i/、/u/ between these two kinds of children.Conclusion The incidence of oral-pharyngeal resonance disorder is high in both two kinds of children,and there is no significant difference in the oral-pharyngeal resonance function between them.
分 类 号:R742.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171