检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢金标[1] 黄国忠[1] 赵金树[1] 杨天宝[1] 许凯声[1]
机构地区:[1]莆田学院附属医院心胸外科福建医科大学教学医院,福建莆田351100
出 处:《泰山医学院学报》2012年第8期599-600,共2页Journal of Taishan Medical College
摘 要:目的探索残胃搭桥术重建消化道连续性治疗食管下段、胃同时性重复癌手术效果。方法采用残胃搭桥术重建消化道连续性治疗的临床14例食管下段、胃同时性重复癌进行回顾性分析,并与先期开展的17例传统的结肠代食道手术方式进行对照分析。结果两组病例在手术时间、住院天数、术后吻合口瘘及肺部感染方面存在差异(P<0.01,P<0.05);术后死亡率较对照组比较有显著意义(P<0.05),1年生存率及3年生存率方面较对照组无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论残胃搭桥术重建消化管连续性治疗食管下段、胃同时性重复癌较先期开展的空肠代食道手术有较大的改进,手术时间、住院天数、术后并发症显著改善,可极大地减少术后死亡率,术后1年、3年生存率无明显差异。Objective : To explore the effect of the reconstruction of alimentary tract by residual gastric bypass surgery to treat a series of patients with reduplicated cancers of the lower cscphageal and stomach. Methods: The cases of 14 patients with reduplicated cancers of the lower esophageal and stomach treated by residual gastric bypass surgery to reconstruct ali- mentary tract were reviewed retrospectively, and were comparatively analyzed regarding 17 cases of patients treated by tradi- tional colonic interposition for esophageal substitution. Results: Ti^ere were some significant differences between two groups of cases in operation time, hospitalization days, postoperative mortality, postoperative anastomotic fistula and lung infection (P〈 0.01 ,P〈 0.05) ; There was no significant difference in survival rate between 1 year and 3 year(P〉 0.05). Con- clusion: Compared to traditional operation, reconstruction of alimentary tract by residual gastric bypass surgery to treat pa- tients with reduplicated cancers of the lower esophageal and stomach achieves greater improvement in operation time, hospi- talization days and the postoperative complications, which can greatly reduce the postoperative mortality rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117