我国司法鉴定前置程序的缺失与建构  

The Deficiency and Rebuilding of the Preposition Procedure of Forensic Expertise in China

作　　者：宋平[1] 张少会[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川理工学院政法学院,四川自贡643000

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2012年第4期99-102,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

基　　金：四川医事卫生法治研究中心资助项目:"医学鉴定的‘二元化’问题研究--兼论医疗侵权司法鉴定制度改革"的阶段性研究成果(YF10-Y13)

摘　　要：在诉讼中案件要件事实涉及专门知识时,法官需委托司法鉴定人对其进行专业性的事实进行判断并得出结论。大陆法系司法鉴定人被视为法官之事实审辅助人,帮助法官进行专业性事实认定,司法鉴定结论在案件中的作用举足轻重。作为入口的司法鉴定前置程序是结论客观、公正性的基础,尤其检材和鉴定资料的真实性具有决定性意义。通过公正的司法鉴定前置程序,保障鉴定材料的合法性、真实性,能够最大限度实现司法鉴定结论的公正性。In a lawsuit, when facts involve professional knowledge, the judge needs to authorize forensic ex- perts to make professional appraisal to get a conclusion. In the continental law system, the forensic expert is seen as an auxilian of the judge during the trial of facts. The forensic expertise conclusion plays an important role in the lawsuit. The preposition procedure of forensic expertise is the basis for an objective and impartial con- clusion and the authenticity and validity of the materials sent for forensic appraisal play a key role in the apprais- al. So, the construction of a just preposition procedure of forensic expertise can achieve the justice of forensic expertise to the largest degree.

关 键 词：司法鉴定 鉴定材料 前置程序 客观公正 

分 类 号：DF718[政治法律—诉讼法学]