检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025 [2]贵州师范大学法学院,贵州贵阳550001
出 处:《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第5期36-44,共9页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:我国地方性法规数量庞大,它们的宪法监督关系到国家法制的统一,也关系到法治国的建设。自1982年宪法颁布30年以来,与宪法相抵触的地方性法规的宪法监督有很大的改进,但也存在明显不足,主要表现在监督主体、提起主体和监督程序等方面。在既有的法律框架下,提炼出符合我国实际情况的监督模式就成为必要。按照相关规定,协调-审查模式是一种不错的选择,该模式符合我国的历史传统,又能充分调动各主体对地方性法规监督的积极性。Our nation has a large number of local laws, and the constitutional supervision of local laws not only relates to the unity of the national legal system, but also to the construction of the nation ruled by law. Since the Constitution enactment in 1982, there has been great improvement in the constitutional supervision of laws and regulations that are incompatible with the Constitution, but there is still much defect, mainly in the supervisors, the subjects of instituting, supervision procedures, and so on. Therefore it is necessary to establish the supervision mode in line with our nation's reality in the existing legal framework. In accordance with the relevant provisions, the coordination-review mode is a good choice, which is consistent with our historical traditions, and also able to fully mobilize various supervisors' enthusiasm for the supervision of local laws.
关 键 词:宪法监督 地方性法规与宪法相抵触 协调-审查模式
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15