检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省德阳市第二人民医院口腔科,618000 [2]青海医学院附属医院口腔科,西宁810000
出 处:《重庆医学》2012年第31期3278-3279,共2页Chongqing medicine
摘 要:目的探讨自锁与普通直丝弓矫治器的矫治效率。方法选择已完成矫治的自锁托槽治疗组24例和普通直丝弓治疗组41例的病历资料进行回顾性分析,比较自锁与普通直丝弓矫治器的矫治效率。结果在拔牙组,非拔牙组数据中,自锁直丝弓的有效复诊次数均少于普通直丝弓矫治组,两组比较结果差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论自锁直丝弓矫治的矫治效率要高于普通直丝弓矫治,而且其高效率优势主要集中在拔牙病例组。临床矫治效率高,值得推广。Objective To discuss the orthodontic treatment efficiency between self-ligating brackets and straight wire appliance. Methods 65 completely treated cases were selected. 24 cases with malocclusion were treated by self-ligating brackets. The other 41 ones were treated by straight wire appliance. And we investigated the efficient difference between self-ligating brackets and straight wire appliance,the data were analyzed statistically. Results Among two sets of data from extraction treatment group and non-ex- traction ones, the visit times with self-ligating brackets were lower than straight wire appliance. There was obvious statistical differ- ence among two groups(P〈0.01). Conclusion The orthodontic treatment effects of self-ligating brackets were superior to straight wire appliance, especially in extraction cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.7.80