检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴楠[1] 阎石[1] 吕超[1] 王宇昭[1] 杨跃[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所胸外二科恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,100142
出 处:《中华胸心血管外科杂志》2012年第10期609-613,共5页Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
基 金:教育部教育振兴行动计划特殊专项“985”工程(985-2-013-39)
摘 要:目的肺癌外科治疗需要遵循严格的质量控制标准以确保手术治疗的效果和病理诊断的准确性,但目前尚未得到足够的重视。方法回顾性总结2007年112例肺癌手术治疗的临床资料,采用美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN,National Comprehensive Cancer Network)、美国外科学院肿瘤研究组(ACOSOG,American College of Surgeons’Oncology Group)和国际肺癌研究会(IASLC,International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer)定义的肺癌外科治疗的手术质量标准作为质控依据,分析外科质量控制工作。结果全组患者无手术死亡。按照NCCN,AGOSOG和ISALC质控标准分析本组R0手术质量达标率分别为79.6%,70.9%和43.7%。中位淋巴结清扫数目27枚(0~63枚),中位纵隔淋巴结切除数目16.5枚(0—43枚),第一站淋巴结切检的中位数目是10.5枚(0~26枚)。中位纵隔淋巴结清扫站数为4站(0。6站)。第二站淋巴结最常清扫的部位是4R、5、6和7组淋巴结,第一站淋巴结中最常清扫的部位10和12组。全组1年生存率92%(95%CI,89~95);3年生存率67%(95%CI,62—72);4年生存率57%(95%CI,52—62)。结论质量控制工作是肺癌外科治疗的核心内容,实行符合国际标准的手术是开展高质量临床研究的前提,建议肺癌外科手术质控应遵循严格的国际标准,以期提高分期诊断的准确性。Objective Surgical treatment of lung cancer needs to follow strict quality control standard for the aims of accuracy of pathological staging and potentially improved prognosis. However, there are short of studies related to surgical quality analysis. Methods One hundred and twelve patients were enlisted with the diagnosis of lung cancer and received surgical intervention in 2007. Surgical quality of these cases were retrospectively analyzed in compliance with three international standards, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) , American College of Surgeons' Ontology Group (ACOSOG) , and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Results No surgical death was reported in this group. According to NCCN, ACOSOG and IASLC standards, qualified operations were 82 cases (80.4%) , 73 cases (71.6%) , 45 cases (44.1%) in 102 cases with RO resection, respectively. The median total lymph nodes, median mediastinal nodes, and N1 nodes were 27 ( range 0 - 63 ) , 16.5 ( range 0 - 43 ) , and 10.5 ( range 0 - 26 ) , respectively. The median mediastinal node stations resected were 4 ( range 0 -6). In the mediastinum, stations of 4R, 5, 6 and 7 presented the highest frequency of re- ceiving lymph node dissection. For N1 stations, 10 and 12 were among the top list. For the whole group, 1-year survival, 3- year survival and 4-year survival were 92% (95% CI,89 -95), 67% (95% CI,62 -72), 57% (95% CI,52 -62), respectively. Conclusion Quality control is the essential part of surgical treatment of lung cancer, which will facilitate the baseline standardization of clinical research. Since IASLC provides the strictest standard for lung cancer surgery, we suggest that all thoracic surgeons need to follow this standard to secure the accuracy of pathological diagnosis and for a potential better prognosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.28.166