检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林勤[1] 吴华[2] 朱鹭超[1] 傅丽蓉[1] 戴明明[1] 王丽琛[1]
机构地区:[1]厦门大学附属第一医院放疗科,361003 [2]厦门大学附属第一医院核医学科及闽南PET中心,361003
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2012年第6期492-495,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基 金:福建省科技项目计划重点项目(闽科技计[2008]59号-11);福建省卫生厅青年基金(2008-1-51);厦门市科技计划指导性项目(3502220077056);厦门市科技局指导性项目(3502220077053)
摘 要:目的对比研究FDGPET—CT不同勾画方法间及与MRI显示鼻咽原发灶靶区差异,探讨FDGPET—CT勾画鼻咽原发灶大体肿瘤体积(GTV)生物靶区的可行性。方法50例初治鼻咽癌患者治疗前均行FDGPET—CT和MRI检查,先在MRI图像上勾画GTV得到GTV—MRI,然后在FDGPET—CT上分别用目测法或不同阈值法(30%、40%、50%SUVmax)勾画GTV得到GTV—PETvis、GTV—PET30、GTV—PET40、GTV—PET50。采用Wilcoxon检验GTV—PET不同方法间和GTV—MRI差异,以及不同T分期中不同勾画方法间差异。结果全组GTV—MRI、GTV—PETvis、GTV—PET30、GTV—PET40、GTV—PET50分别为27.8、22.2、22.7、14.4、9.0cm3,除GTV-PETvis与GTV—PET30间(Z==0.05,P=0.958)以及T1~2期(25例)GTV—MRI与GTV-PETvis和GTV—PET30相似外(Z=-0.93、-0.93,P=0.353、0.353),其余均不同(Z=-5.74~-2.09,P=0.000~0.037)。结论应用FDGPET—CT不同方法勾画的GTV—PET均〈GTV—MRI。FDGPET—CT目测法或以30%SUVmax为阈值自动勾画鼻咽原发灶GTV可实现生物代谢肿瘤体积范围勾画。Objective To compare gross tumor volume (GTV) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) according to MRI and FDG PET/CT and to investigated four fixed threshold methods to delineate the GTV using FDG PET/CT. Methods Fifty patients with primary biopsy-proven NPC were prospectively were enrolled into the study. FDG PET/CT scans and MRI were carried out within one week prior to pretreatment, respectively. The GTV was named GTV-MRI ( GTV were delineated according to MRI) , GTV-PETviS, GTV- PET30, GTV-PET4o, GTV-PETso ( GTV was delineated according to the PET-based GTVs obtained by visual interpretationor, by percentage of the SUVm= (30%, 40%, 50%) thresholds, respectively). The differences were compared among the GTV-MRI, GTV-PETvis, GTV-PET30, GTV-PET40 and GTV-PET50 in different by Wilcoxon test. Results Of 50 patients, the median of volume descending order were : GTV-MRI 27.8 cm3 , GTV-PETvis 22. 2 cm3 , GTV-PET30 22. 7 cm3 , GTV-PET40 14.4 cm3 and GTV-PET50 9.0 cm3. However, there was no significant difference between GTV-PETvis and GTV-PET30 (Z= -0.05, P= 0. 958),as well as GTV-MRI and GTV-PETvis or GTV-PET30 in 25 patients who were T1-2 stage (Z= - 0. 93, - 0. 93, P = 0. 353,0. 353 ) , the other GTVs were all different in 50 patients' ( Z = - 5.74- - 2. 09, P = 0. 000 - 0. 037 ). Conclusions All the GTVs delineated by the different methods of using FDG PET/CT were less than the GTV delineated by MRI. The potential advantages with the GTV-PETvis or GTV-PET3o delineated by FDG PET/CT are reduction of biological metabolic tumor volume in GTV delineation and reduction of the size of the GTV in NPC patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43