检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈丽芳[1] 焦建杰[2] 张才丽[2] 娄建石[2]
机构地区:[1]天津市海河医院药剂科,天津300350 [2]天津医科大学基础医学院药理教研室,天津300070
出 处:《中国临床药理学杂志》2012年第10期761-764,共4页The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
摘 要:目的用有限采样法(LSS)估算口服阿莫西林的生物等效性。方法 20名健康志愿者口服阿莫西林参比药物和受试药物500 mg后采集若干时间点血浆样品,用高效液相色谱法测定阿莫西林血药浓度,用经典方法计算药代动力学参数,评价生物等效性。另以参比药物血药浓度数据作为建模数据,用LSS法估算药代动力学参数Cmax、AUC0-t,选择最佳模型进行生物等效性评价。内外部验证均用Jackknife法。结果以2个和3个血药浓度数据点预测的药代动力学参数回归模型的线性关系较好。内部和外部验证表明:以血药浓度数据2点组合C1,C3和3点组合C1,C2,C4估算AUC0-t的准确性最好(预测误差<1%,绝对误差<10%);又以2点组合C1,C1.5和3点组合C1.5,C2,C6估算Cmax的准确性最好(预测误差<2%,绝对误差<10%);并以3点组合C1.5,C2,C6同时估算AUC0-t和Cmax的准确性较好。与经典法评价结果一致。结论用LSS法估算口服阿莫西林药代动力学参数评价生物等效性是可行的,为有限采样法评价生物等效性提供新的思路和计算方法。Objective To develop limited sampling strategy (LSS) for estimating bioequivalence of amoxicillin. Methods Twenty male healthy subjects were enrolled in this bioequivalence study. All subjects were di- vided into two groups randomly and administered orally reference and test formulation of 500 mg amoxicillin. The blood concentrations of amoxicil- lin were determined by the validated HPLC method. A multiple linear re- gression analysis was developed for estimating C and AUC0-t using the amoxicillin concentration of the reference formulation to develop LSS models. The LSS models were internally validated by the Jackknife meth- od. The models were also externally validated by bioequivalence assess- ment of the test amoxicillin formulation based on LSS derived C and AUC0-s,values, The results were compared with those obtained using tra- ditional method. Results The results indicate:several models for these parameters estimation met the predefined criteria. Validation tests indica- ted that most informative sampling points C1 , C3 and C1 , C2, C4 provided accurate estimations of the parameters AUC0_,. ( prediction error 〈 1%, absolute percentage 〈 10% ) ,And C1 , C1.5 and C1.5, C2, C6 provided ac- curate estimations of the parameters Cmax ( prediction error 〈 2%, abso- lute percentage 〈 9%). The combination of C1.5, C2, C6 might bechosen as sampling hours for predicting AUC0_, and C according to requirement. It is according with classical assess- ment. Conclusion The bioequivalence assessment results showed that LSS models provided correct assessment of bio- equivalence between two amoxicillin preparations. The method is accurant and can be considered desirable for amoxicil- lin bioequivalence study.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.123.254