检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王秋杰[1]
出 处:《法学杂志》2012年第11期149-153,共5页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:通缉作为一项强制性措施,在司法实践中被广泛运用,能够有效地打击犯罪、防止犯罪蔓延、保障诉讼活动的顺利进行。当前,我国通缉制度面临通缉对象模糊、行使主体不明确、发布范围尴尬、撤销程序有瑕疵、救济机制缺失等困境,一定程度上影响了其效能的发挥。因此,欲完善通缉制度,需要界定通缉对象、明确行使主体、调整通缉范围、完善撤销制度、建立救济机制等。As a mandatory measure, wanted is widely used in the judicial practice, which can effectively fight against crime, prevent crime spreading, and protect the lawsuit activity from disturbing. Now, wanted system is facing many dilemmas. The object of wanted is obscure. The subject of perform is not clear. The scope of publishment is embarrassed. The procedure of cancellation has flaws. The mechanism of relief is missing. These dilemmas impact on its effective performance at certain degree. Therefore, this paper will discuss how to improve the system of wanted. We should define the object of wanted, clear the subject of perform, adjust the scope, improve the system of revoked and establish the mechanism of remedy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3