荀爽与《九家易》  

XUN Shuang and the Jiujia yi

作　　者：王棋[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学马克思主义学院,江苏徐州221008

出　　处：《周易研究》2012年第5期56-63,共8页Studies of Zhouyi

摘　　要：在荀爽与《九家易》关系问题上"荀集九家"和"九家述荀"两种观点对立。易学家尚秉和先生根据荀爽易学与《九家易》有相同的古易学说,认同前一种观点。但其理由并不充分,《九家易》不是淮南九师《易》,该书并非荀爽所集。《九家易》当成书于虞翻之后,是汉魏易学嬗变、魏晋时期象数易学与义理易学斗争的产物。研究荀爽与《九家易》的关系对于衡定荀爽易学的历史地位、把握汉魏象数易学向义理易学的演变脉络具有重要意义。For the relationship between Xun Shuang （ 128 - 190） and the Jiujia yi （ Nine Schools of the Studies of Changes） , there are two opposite points of view ： one holds that Xun Shuan collected the nine schools, and the other contends that the nine schools succeeded Xun＇s ideas. Basing on the contents of the ancient Changes shared by Xun Shuang＇s Yi-olagy and the nine schools, Mr. Shang Bingbe （ 1870 - 1950） agrees with the former viewpoint, but his reasons are not adequate in that the nine schools＇Yi studies were not the legacy of the nine teachers of Huainan mentioned in Huannanzi. The Jiujia yi ought to be composed after the era of Yu Fan （ 164 -233 ） and be a product of the evolution of the Changes and the struggles between the image -numerology school and meaning-pattern school. Studying the relationship between Xun Shuang and the nine schools＇Changes is significant for us to determine the historical position of his scholarship and grasp the evolution of the Yi studies from image-numerology to meaning -pattem.

关 键 词：荀爽 易学 《九家易》 

分 类 号：B234.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]