中西“礼仪之争”与中国近代化转型——从话语之争到身份之辩  

Etiquette Controversy between China and the West and its Influence on China's Modernization Transformation ——from Discourse Controversy to Identity Debate

作　　者：翟石磊[1,2] 杨舒[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学外文学院,江苏徐州221116 [2]上海外国语大学国际关系与全球事务研究院,上海200083

出　　处：《西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第6期36-41,共6页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题"人文通识教育理念下的理工科院校大学英语课程设置研究"(GPA115039)

摘　　要：始于明朝的"西学东渐"浪潮深刻地影响了近代中国的发展。基于文化差异而引发的礼仪之争既体现了中西方话语权的冲突,更揭示了不同文明下的"身份之辩"。西方展示出一种相对开放的话语体系接受"多元"文化,而当时的中华帝国的话语体系则相对封闭,强调文化的"内在系统循环性"。在身份认同上,中西方均追求基于"一元身份"的"中心地位",否认合作式的多元身份共存,这是中西"礼仪之争"的实质所在。西方以"救世主"心态对外散播其宗教文化,借助工业革命的浪潮,顺应了近代化转型的需要,最终形成了西强东弱的近代格局。The ＂Western Learning＂ movement started in the Ming Dynasty and produced significant effect on modern China. Etiquette controversy, which was then triggered for the sake of cultural differences between China and the West, embodies the clash of discursive power on the surface. However, in essence, it reveals the identity debate. The West embraces relatively open discourse system, accepting diverse ＂voices＂ ; whereas, rulers of the Ming empire still are confined to the closed discourse system, emphasizing culturally ＂internal systematic circulation＂. As to cultural identification, both China and the West pursue the ＂exclusive-identity＂ based on ＂ethnocentrism＂, ignoring the co-existence of diverse identities. By spreading its religion and culture with ＂The Savior＂ in mind, together with the assistance of the Industrial Revolution, the West then complies with the need of modernization, and finally a new world order is formed.

关 键 词：中西文化 礼仪之争 话语权 一元身份 近代化转型 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学] G04[历史地理—中国史]