教唆犯二重性说的逻辑困境及其反思  

The Legal Dilemma and Introspections on the Dual Character of Abetting

作　　者：朱道华[1] 

机构地区：[1]佛山大学法学院,广东佛山528000

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2012年第6期139-145,共7页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：本人主持的教育部人文社科青年基金项目(10YJC820182)"教唆犯研究"

摘　　要：作为我国教唆犯本质属性通说的二重性说,将教唆犯的成立根据与处罚根据混为一谈,以行为的评价等同责任的认定,具有方法论上的错误。二重性说这一概念采用双重的划分标准,将一个概念在同一视角下同时解释为两个以上相反的意义,违反了理论研究的逻辑规则,不仅有损刑法理论结构的协调性,也有违刑法规范的同一性。二重性说违背我国现阶段的刑事政策、脱离社会事实基础并导致操作规则的混乱,存在诸多理论暗礁。犯罪预备性才是教唆行为的本质属性,教唆犯的属性取决于对犯罪预备行为的立法技术。As the essential attribute of the dual character of the abetting,it is said that the establishment of abetting in accordance with the punishment and evaluation of the behavior just as recognition of an equal responsibility,the methodology of which is wrong.The concept of the duality use dual standards and explain the abetting at the same time as two or more opposite meaning,which violating the logical rules of theoretical research and undermine the structure of the coordination of criminal law theory.The theory of dual character of abetting violates the current Chinese policy,deviate from social reality and leads to the chaos of the operating rules.Preparatory criminal act is the essential attribute of abetting behavior,the property of abettor depends on the legislative techniques on preparatory criminal acts.

关 键 词：教唆犯 二重性 教唆行为 犯罪预备行为 立法技术 

分 类 号：D918.2[政治法律—法学]