我国现行有限卷证移送方式的基本内容  

A Study of Essential Requirements of Submission of Specific Case Materials in Present Chinese Criminal Proceedings

作　　者：唐治祥[1] 扈力[1] 肖洁 

机构地区：[1]重庆三峡学院,重庆万州404100 [2]云南安宁市人民检察院,云南安宁650000

出　　处：《重庆三峡学院学报》2012年第6期126-130,共5页Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目"公正审判视野下的刑事卷证移送及其配套制度研究"(12BFX057);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"刑事卷证移送制度改革研究"(11YJA820068);重庆三峡学院博士资助计划项目(12ZZ49)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：在检察机关提起公诉时依法必须移送的卷证材料中,由于起诉书、证据目录和证人名单指代明确、争议不大,最高人民法院和最高人民检察院的司法解释以及"六机关"《规定》对其作了大致相同的规定,但就"主要证据复印件或照片"而言,由于"主要证据"的内涵、外延和判断标准具有较强的主观性,最高人民法院和最高人民检察院曾经对其作了截然不同的规定,即使是在"六机关"《规定》出台之后,两者仍然存在不少分歧。Because the indictment and lists of evidence and witnesses are unequivocal,and the Supreme People＇s Court and Procuratorate and other Chinese State organs made roughly the same explanation of them,there is no much conflict.But in terms of main evidence＇s copy or photograph,since main evidence＇s connotation and standards of judgment are subjective,the Supreme People＇s Court and Procuratorate made quite different explanations of it before the Six Organs＇ Joint Regulation was issued.Even after the Six Organs＇ Joint Regulation was issued,there is still much conflict between them.

关 键 词：起诉书 证据目录 证人名单 主要证据 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]