检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国.郑州大学西亚斯国际学院,新郑451150
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2012年第10期1588-1590,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:河南省教育厅自然科学研究指导计划项目立项课题。项目名称:"控制源;应对方式;家庭养育方式关系的实证研究";项目编号:2010C630024;西亚斯基金会赞助
摘 要:目的探讨大学生父母教养方式与心理控制源的关系。方法使用父母教养方式量表(EMBU)和内控性、有势力的他人及机遇量表(IPC),随机整群抽取493名大学生进行调查分析。结果①大学生在机遇上存在性别差异(t=3.93;P<0.01);②本、专科生在内控性、有势力的他人和机遇上存在显著差异(t=-3.99,6.95,5.02;P<0.01);③母亲情感温暖与理解显著预测内控性(β=0.134;P<0.01),父亲拒绝否认、过度保护与母亲惩罚严厉、情感温暖理解能显著预测有势力的他人和机遇(β=0.143,0.145,0.147,-0.161;P<0.05;β=0.219;0.148;0.127;-0.132;P<0.05),而母亲偏爱被试显著预测有势力的他人(β=0.139;P<0.01)。结论①女生和本科生的家庭教养方式更积极,更内控;②家庭教养方式中的积极因素有利于形成内控性,消极因素更能影响外控性的形成。Objective To explore the relationship between locus of control and parenting style of college students.Methods A total of 493 college students were investigated by EMBU and IPC.Results ① There was significant gender difference in score of chance(t=3.93,P0.01);② Junior college students' scores in internality,denial powerful others and chance were different with college students(t=-3.99,6.95,5.02;P0.01);③Mother's warm and understanding could predict internality(β=0.134,P0.01),father's rejection,denial,protection and mother's penalty,severe,warm and understanding could predict powerful others and chance(β=0.143,0.145,0.147,-0.161;P0.05;β=0.219;0.148;0.127;-0.132;P0.05);Mother's protection just could predict powerful others(β=0.139,P0.01).Conclusion ① Female students or college students accepted more positive parenting patterns,their attribution are more internality.② Positive parts of parenting style are good for attribution of internality,and passive parts are easy to cause the attribution of powerful others and chance.
分 类 号:R179[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80