检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第323医院数字口腔中心,陕西西安710045
出 处:《口腔医学研究》2012年第11期1163-1164,1168,共3页Journal of Oral Science Research
摘 要:目的:比较正常庞特指数与AngleI错畸形庞特指数之间的差异,分析错畸形切牙牙冠与磨牙宽度之间的关系。方法:选取Angle I错畸形患者40例,取上下颌硅橡胶模型,使用三维扫描仪进行三维扫描,然后使用计算机正畸设计软件OrthoRx V3.20建立三维模型并进行数据处理,在模型上选取测量标志点对各项指标进行测量,最终应用spss17.0统计软件分析AngleI错与正常之间差异。结果:AngleI错畸形上颌庞特指数与以往研究一致,下颌前磨牙和磨牙间庞特指数有显著性差异。结论:AngleI错畸形患者上颌骨各部的发育比例与正常颌基本一致,下颌畸形形成因素较复杂,需要根据个体情况适当扩展牙弓宽度。Objective: To analyse the correlation between pont's index of normal occlusion and Angle I malocclusion as well as incisor tooth size and arch width. Methods: 40 Angle I malocclusion were selected, silicone rubber impres- sion material of the maxillary and mandibular were taken. All impression were scaned by a special laser scanner and treated with OrthoRx V3.20 to install digital models, and then some landmarks were selected in the digital models. all data were analyzed by SpsslT. 0 to compare the differerce. Results: The correlation between maxillary ponfs in- dex of normal occlusion and Angle I malocclusion was in accordance with previous study. Howere, as well in man- dibular there were significant difference for index of premolar and molar. Conclusion: The growgh proportion of An- gle I maxillary are consistence with normal occlusion. The formative factor of mandibular was complicated. Individ- ual difference must be combined to the width of mandibular arch.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.184