检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙晓娟[1]
机构地区:[1]盐城市妇幼保健院口腔科,江苏盐城224002
出 处:《口腔医学研究》2012年第11期1174-1175,共2页Journal of Oral Science Research
摘 要:目的:比较Vitapex糊剂和普通氢氧化钙2种材料诱导根尖成形的疗效。方法:选择76颗牙外伤或已有牙髓病变的年轻恒牙,随机分成两组,分别用Vitapex糊剂、氢氧化钙糊剂行根尖诱导术。结果:经2年的随访观察,根尖诱导成功率Vitapex组为94.73%、氢氧化钙组78.95%,结果经χ2检验差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:Vitapex糊剂诱导年轻恒牙根尖成形较普通氢氧化钙糊剂效果更好。Objective.. To compare the effectiveness between Vitapex paste and calcium hydroxide paste when used in apexification. Methods: 76 young permanent teeth with dental trauma or endodontic lesions were randomly divid- ed into two groups. Apexification with Vitapex was applied to one group and with calcium hydroxide to the other. Results: With two--year follow--up, success rate for apexification with Vitapex was 94.73 % while with calcium hydroxide was 78.95 %. A chi--squared test was performed to prove the statistical significance (P〈0.05). Conclu- sion: Vitapex paste performs better in apexification than calcium hydroxide for young permanent teeth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69