论调解公正  

On Mediation Fairness

作　　者：王钢[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北大学法学院,陕西西安710127

出　　处：《未来与发展》2012年第11期30-33,共4页Future and Development

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(项目编号:11CFX052);陕西省教育厅社科基金项目(项目编号:12JK0008)

摘　　要：调解公正包括实质公正、程序公正及心理公正三个方面。就实质公正而言,只有当调解员所建议的解决办法或可能的和解结果,尽可能多地维护了当事人各方的利益,或者与当事人自己对调解结果的预期基本吻合时,当事人才可能产生公正的感受,从而也才可能愿意达成和解。就程序公正而言,调解员实现调解公正的最好办法之一,就是促使当事人尽可能积极地参与并主导调解进程,而不是由当事人被动接受调解员为他们所做的选择。就心理公正而言,在调解体系中,当事人自己的公正观,成为衡量调解公正的重要、乃至终极标准。调解过程及结果的公正与否最终取决于每一方当事人对公正的个人看法。这是基于调解的当事人主导特性所做出的推论。The fairness of mediation includes three aspects： the substantive fairness, the procedural fairness and the psychological fairness. As for the substantive fairness, it requires the mediators to propose some solutions or possibilities which can protect the parties＇ best interest on one hand and to achieve the results which more or less live up to the parties＇ expectations on the other hand. Only under these circumstances can the parties feel the fairness and be willing to reach an agreement with each other. As for the procedural fairness, the best way to achieve fair results for mediators is to encourage the parties to actively participate in the mediation and to control the whole process instead of passively accepting the choices the mediators made for them. As for the psychological fairness, the parties ＇ own sense of fairness is the crucial even ultimate measuring standard for the fairness of the mediation system. The fairness of mediation depends much on each party ＇ s view and attitude towards it, because of the party-oriented character of mediation process.

关 键 词：调解 公正 当事人主导 心理公正 

分 类 号：D915.14[政治法律—诉讼法学]