微创胸腔闭式引流术与传统胸腔闭式引流术治疗自发性气胸疗效比较  

Effect Comparison of Minimally Invasive Catheter Puncture and Traditional Closed Thoracic Drainage in Spontaneous Pneumothorax

作　　者：蔡强[1] 陆志斌[1] 周存荣[1] 徐晓晗[2] 吴延虎[2] 

机构地区：[1]南京市浦口区中心医院胸心外科,南京211800 [2]江苏省人民医院胸心外科,南京210029

出　　处：《中国医药导刊》2012年第10期1705-1705,1707,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide

摘　　要：目的:比较微创胸腔闭式引流术与传统胸腔闭式引流术治疗自发性气胸疗效。方法:将56例自发性气胸患者随机分入对照组与观察组,观察组患者采用微创胸腔闭式引流术治疗,对照组患者接受传统胸腔闭式引流术。结果:观察组患者治疗总有效率为93.8%,对照组为83.3%(P<0.05);观察组肺复张时间、术后胸痛时间、操作时间、切口大小及患者住院时间均显著优于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:微创胸腔闭式引流术治疗自发性气胸损伤小、恢复快,是治疗自发性气胸的理想治疗方法。Objective：To compare the effect of minimally invasive catheter puncture and traditional closed thoracic drainage in spontaneous pneumothorax.Methods：56 cases with spontaneous pneumothorax were randomly divided into control group and experience group： experience group underwent minimally invasive catheter puncture,and control group had orthodox methods.Results：Total effective rate were 93.8% and 83.3% in experience group and control group respectively（P0.05）.The average time of alveolar recruitment,the time of chest pain after operation,operation time,incision area and hospital stay in experience group were superior to that in control group.Conclusion：Minimally invasive catheter puncture is an ideal method to cure spontaneous pneumothorax for its less injure and faster recovery.

关 键 词：自发性气胸 胸腔闭式引流术 微创 

分 类 号：R561.4[医药卫生—呼吸系统]